Search found 14 matches
- Thu Mar 31, 2022 10:26 am
- Forum: RETC
- Topic: Interval of Confidence
- Replies: 3
- Views: 34584
Re: Interval of Confidence
Thanks for your explanation Jirka, but it is somehow still unclear to me sorry. So, only if the number of observations minus the number of parameters is bigger than 0, RETC does: Z=1./FLOAT(NOB-NP) TVAR=1.96+Z*(2.3779+2*(2.7135+2*(3.187936+2.466666*Z**2))) SECOEF-E(I)*SDEV TVALUE-TH(I)/SECOEF TVALUE...
- Wed Mar 30, 2022 12:13 pm
- Forum: RETC
- Topic: Interval of Confidence
- Replies: 3
- Views: 34584
Interval of Confidence
Dear All, I was wondering if somebody could explain me or point me out to the literature in order to know How the 95% interval of confidence in RETC is calculated. In "1.7 Parameter Optimization and Nonlinear Fitting" Simunek and Hopmans, equation [1.7-24] states that betamin = beta - tdistribution*...
- Wed Jul 21, 2021 3:59 pm
- Forum: Hydrus 1D (old free version)
- Topic: No result after successful calculation
- Replies: 13
- Views: 30034
- Tue Jul 20, 2021 7:48 am
- Forum: Hydrus 1D (old free version)
- Topic: No result after successful calculation
- Replies: 13
- Views: 30034
Re: No result after successful calculation
Oh, I did not know that. Might I ask you how do you know that it is badly defined. I mean I know that If I have an unknown I will need 1 equation, if I have 5 unknowns then 5 equations (that are linear independent between them). So I wonder, how can I know (before hand) if it is well or bad defined?...
- Mon Jul 19, 2021 3:20 pm
- Forum: Hydrus 1D (old free version)
- Topic: No result after successful calculation
- Replies: 13
- Views: 30034
Re: No result after successful calculation
Hi,
I have the same problem (see attached document), and so far I still have solved, It did not have this problem for similar models. Any idea how to solve will be helpful, maybe it is just a dumb mistake.
Thanks
Best regards,
Dani
I have the same problem (see attached document), and so far I still have solved, It did not have this problem for similar models. Any idea how to solve will be helpful, maybe it is just a dumb mistake.
Thanks
Best regards,
Dani
- Tue Jun 15, 2021 5:15 pm
- Forum: Hydrus 1D (old free version)
- Topic: Solute mass transfer in dual permeability
- Replies: 5
- Views: 11948
Re: Solute mass transfer in dual permeability
Dear Prof. Dr. Simunek, I have two doubt concerning this post: 1) Is the Gamma_s (i.e. solute mass transfer term (ML-3T-1)) in Hydrus-1D calculated only as FracMTS(i)? or it is calculated like equation (7) of Gerke and van Genuchten [1996], namely: FracMTS(i)+Gamma_w*(ci) where Gamma_w is water tran...
- Tue Jun 15, 2021 4:56 pm
- Forum: Hydrus 1D (old free version)
- Topic: Mass exchange term in dual-permeability model
- Replies: 4
- Views: 8722
Re: Mass exchange term in dual-permeability model
Dear Prof. Dr. Simunek, I have a doubt concerning equation (2.99) or (2.102) in manual version 4.17 (June 2013). The equation is given as: K_a(h) = 0.5*[K_a(h_f)+K_a(h_m)], here K_a(h) would be rKaFi. Can this equation be we written as: K_A(h)=0.5*[K_a*(krf(h_f)+krm(h_m))]. ? where h_f is the pressu...
- Tue Jun 15, 2021 4:48 pm
- Forum: Hydrus 1D (old free version)
- Topic: Mass exchange term in dual-permeability model
- Replies: 4
- Views: 8722
Re: Mass exchange term in dual-permeability model
Dear Prof. Dr. Jirka, I have a doubt concerning equation (2.99) or (2.102) in manual version 4.17 (June 2013). The equation is given as: K_a(h) = 0.5*[K_a(h_f)+K_a(h_m)], here K_a(h) would be rKaFi. Can this equation be we written as: K_A(h)=0.5*[K_a*(krf(h_f)+krm(h_m))]. ? where h_f is the pressure...
- Fri Jun 11, 2021 4:41 pm
- Forum: Hydrus 1D (old free version)
- Topic: No effect in concentration of constant flux boundary condition
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5323
Re: No effect in concentration of constant flux boundary condition
Sorry. Thanks, it works perfectly.
- Fri Jun 11, 2021 7:55 am
- Forum: Hydrus 1D (old free version)
- Topic: No effect in concentration of constant flux boundary condition
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5323
No effect in concentration of constant flux boundary condition
Hi all, I am running a simple simulation (see attached file). I have a simple Richards' equation and Solute Transport. In Richards' equation I have as boundary conditions: 1) Lower Boundary conditions: Variable Pressure Head, 2) Upper Boundary condition: Constant Flux. I have noticed that changing t...
- Tue Nov 24, 2020 4:18 pm
- Forum: HP1 (HYDRUS-1D - PHREEQC)
- Topic: Species not transported
- Replies: 1
- Views: 31045
Species not transported
Hi, I was wondering if somebody knows what happens with the mass of a species that is not transport. Imaging that I have only defined As(5) as a component in the transport part, and then after a batch calculation Phreeqc assumes that there is some redox part of As(5) that becomes As(3). What happens...
- Tue Sep 22, 2020 1:47 pm
- Forum: HP1 (HYDRUS-1D - PHREEQC)
- Topic: _Raw phreeqc format
- Replies: 0
- Views: 90163
_Raw phreeqc format
Hi, I was wondering if somebody has previously work with HP1 inputing Phreeqc files _Raw (Such as Solution_Raw, Equilibrium_phases_raw, ...) I have done the first tutorial of the manual (Transport and Dissolution of Gypsum and Calcite) but I have changed the solution 1001 equilibrium_phases 1001 gyp...
- Mon Jan 13, 2020 3:18 pm
- Forum: HP1 (HYDRUS-1D - PHREEQC)
- Topic: HP1 with more than 20 solutes
- Replies: 4
- Views: 40748
Re: HP1 with more than 20 solutes
Yes, my bad about Mn. Now, it is working with less than 20 solutes.
- Mon Jan 13, 2020 1:20 pm
- Forum: HP1 (HYDRUS-1D - PHREEQC)
- Topic: HP1 with more than 20 solutes
- Replies: 4
- Views: 40748
HP1 with more than 20 solutes
Dear Hydrus (and HP1) users, I have not found any post where somebody has work with more than 20 components in HP1 (using the grapical interface it seems to be the maximum). Using the graphical interface of Hydrus-1D. I have been able to run HP1 with 19 components (no interaction with any surface, o...